Fructose is the most evil monosaccharide there is according to most nutritionists out there.
One of the main reasons why is because it’s thought to deplete ATP. Glucose is thought to enter a cell on an insulin-dependent mechanism (GLUT4), whereas fructose doesn’t require insulin to enter a cell (GLUT2 and GLUT5).
Here’s what you’ll hear them say: “Fructose doesn’t require insulin to enter a cell, so it streams in, overwhelms the cell, and depletes ATP. Glucose requires insulin so its uptake is limited to insulin.”
My reply to that is: “Glucose can also enter a cell without insulin through other glucose transporters, such as GLUT1. In fact, research shows that the rate of glucose uptake is dependent on the amount of glucose in the blood. In the face of hyperglycemia, tissue glucose uptake is usually increased above normal even when insulin deficiency is severe.”
To which they respond:
Furthermore, it’s impossible for fructose to deplete ATP, even if you consume a very large amount of it, and here’s why… Let’s look at glycolysis (on the left) and fructolysis (on the right) in the diagram below.
As you can see, fructokinase uses ATP as a cofactor to convert fructose into fructose-1-phosphate. So if a large amount of fructose streams into the cell, it can deplete ATP right? Incorrect.
If we look a little further down, 1,3-Biphosphoglycerate conversion to 3-Phosphoglycerate creates an ATP. And a little further down, you generate another ATP by converting phosphoenolpyruvate to pyruvate. But for 1 glucose or 1 fructose molecule, that will be 2 ATP (check the diagram below).
Complete conversion of glucose to pyruvate generates 2 ATP (2 loss and 4 gain). Complete conversion of fructose generates 3 ATP (if all the fructose-1-phosphate goes to Dihydroxyacetone instead of also to Glyceraldehyde; which is not the case ofc.). But the point being is that despite the 1 loss of ATP at the start, it still gains 4 ATP back, which is more than glucose (since glucose loses 2 ATP). So no matter how fast fructose enters a cell, it can never deplete ATP unless someone has some serious mutations in glycolysis. And this excludes complete oxidative phosphorylation where pyruvate is converted to water and CO2 and creates 26 additional ATP.
So in summary, fructose actually generates more ATP than glucose. Quite the opposite of depleting ATP don’t you think?
But neither 100% of glucose nor fructose are ever completely converted to pyruvate as there are many side paths they can go. But the fact still stands that fructose doesn’t deplete ATP.
Please share this article with any fructose haters/conservatives you may know. 🙂
- Insulin: the wrongly accused hormone
- Myth: Fructose is bad for you. Busted!
- Why the side effects of sugar are based on flawed research and how to make sugar work for you instead of against you
- Does fruit juice increase triglycerides?
- Why sugar doesn’t make you fat – the ultimate guide on lipogenesis
5 of the latest reviews
Love the newsletter and all the community work you do. Just gave the newsletter 5 🤩 !
Amazing newsletter from an all round great guy.
I first came across Hans a few years ago on the raypeatforums where he posted excellent threads and was very helpful to all who requested his advice. Since then he has helped me directly through paid coaching and email advice. Hans was totally understandable and more than patient in helping me through my long term issues at a time when I was struggling in general. Since then things have improved a lot but nevertheless Hans has only been an email away for all manner of topics. He has answered questions and given his advice countless times at no cost and I am so grateful for this. If you are looking for someone to improve your health in any way combined with a patient and caring disposition I dont think you will find anyone as good as Hans at such reasonable prices worldwide. He is truly one in a million
Best newsletter i know
No kidding, i think it’s the best Newsletter I’ve ever received.
Once a week with interesting topics, it makes me looking forward to getting it in my mail. Also noteworthy is that Hans is very fast at answering mails in genereal.
Brilliant newsletter, still the most sane balance of technical information relevant to daily life plus humor, and a bit of philosophy to stimulate our human progress. Hans, I find that the effort you put into this page becomes my own workout just to process and apply it fully. Thanks man.
Hans provides a lot of good useful health info gleaned from his penetrating, intelligent research.